The acequia that runs parallel to Cañoncito Creek and past Grace Vigil’s home sits dry after a flood July 12.

Grace Vigil peered through the blinds of her mobile home near Mora last week and, seeing the wall of water rushing toward her, realized how few options she had. 

To her left was Cañoncito Creek, which had swelled over its banks, growing large and fast enough to carry trees and debris at high speed. To her right was the flooded acequia, also impassable. Between them, a small garden, a pile of sandbags and, crashing down the valley, a 4-foot wall of water that she feared would sweep her away. 

She ripped open the door of her home and called for her dogs, her shouts silenced by the roar of the flood. 

“And then I said, What do I do? There’s nothing I could do,” she said. “So I called 911. I stayed with them for like half an hour before they got here.”

The sheriff’s deputy who eventually arrived couldn’t get to her. A culvert had been jammed with debris and the creek water flooded the road. Luckily, in the meantime, a small flower garden fence saved her. It diverted the water around her home. 

Today, the garden is full of silt. The metal rods that held up the fence are bent, but still standing. 

“If it hadn’t been there,” she said of the fence, “I’d be in the Gulf of Mexico by now.”

In the days since the flood on July 12, the creek has returned to its peaceful trickle, cutting through a fresh layer of silt and debris. But Vigil finds it difficult to sleep, haunted by the jolt of panic and feeling of helplessness as the flood raced toward her home. 

And the acequia, which once sustained Vigil’s family’s farm for generations, has gone dry. Upstream, a culvert is blocked with debris with a layer of silt behind it stretching about 100 yards.

There are about 80 acequias in the burn scar of the Hermits Peak-Calf Canyon fire, said Paula Garcia, executive director of the New Mexico Acequia Association. Many were damaged due to the blaze, which is the largest in state history, or in the ensuing floods quickened by hydrophobic soils in badly burned swaths of forest. Many of the waterways are choked with silt or clogged with trees, shrubs or rocks.

Acequias like the one through Vigil’s valley have made agriculture and life possible for the residents of Mora and San Miguel Counties for generations, not to mention their roles as cultural touchstones and community builders. Restoring them will require a systematic approach, one that is ill-suited to the slow-moving federal government and cash-strapped local governments, Garcia said. 

“To do a comprehensive rehab on the acequias, we’re going to need a different program and a different creative solution,” she told Source New Mexico. “And then there’s the need for short-term emergency repairs to keep them operational.”

The acequias provided for farmers and ranchers as they grew hay and other crops, or watered their cattle. Many of those farmers and ranchers are now displaced. To Garcia, the first step in bringing people home to continue centuries of agricultural tradition is to get those acequias flowing again.

But to do that, we’ll need to know where they are.


The network of sustenance


The acequias in Mora and San Miguel counties, many of them hand-carved by farmers for their individual plots, trace their origins over 200 years. The first documented acequia, built around 1816 near Cleveland, diverted water from a tributary of the Rio Pueblo, according to a 2010 paper from the Center for Southwest Research. It was built with the apparent consent of the Picuris Pueblo.

Some of the ditches were built by pueblos, as well. But others built in the 1800s prompted lawsuits between the tribes and the new arrivals over alleged overuse of the river. 

The historic irrigation ditches, to some researchers, represent a bygone confluence and collaboration of Indigenous and Hispanic cultures. The acequias, along with water rights in a drying West, have also been contested and opposed over their long histories. 

The 1.5-mile acequia serving Vigil and about 30 other farmers and ranchers was first carved in 1816 by the Picuris Pueblo and then completed in 1835, said Larry Bradshaw, the mayordomo, who stewards the waterway.


No way forward without a map


In the years since, a network of hundreds of miles of acequias has emerged in the area, governed by mayordomos, used by parciantes and maintained by volunteers in annual limpias. 

But there is no comprehensive map of them. Garcia said that’s the first step in determining the scope of the problem and in creating claims for reimbursement from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 

Even while the fire raged, she said employees of the association began walking each mile of the ditch network, taking photographs and marking geotags of where they meander through fields and forest. 

So far, the association has mapped about 52 acequias, many of them a mile or two long but others much longer. They’ve found many of them full of silt of debris. Others trickle with black water, turbid from the post-fire floods. 

“I’ve been doing a lot of field visits to go see the damage. And the debris flows are serious enough to impede the basic operation of the acequia,” she said. “And in some cases, they are not flowing because they are clogged with sediment and debris. So it’s a huge problem.”

Soon, the association will release the first map of acequias in the burn scar in partnership with the Office of the State Engineer and other agencies. 

The office has maintained a map for more than a century showing where state streams are diverted. Staff has been working on refining it in recent years to identify acequias. But the state acknowledges the record is incomplete and that many of the acequias are unmapped or unnamed.

The map also relies partially on satellite data, Garcia said, which can cause inaccuracy or miss acequias that flow under a tree canopy. The OSE map shows only three named acequias in the burn scar, with many others labeled as “ditches” without names. The acequia serving Vigil, for example, is unnamed and only partially mapped in the OSE database. 

“It’s a really good resource, but the field mapping we’re doing complements that,” she said. “It’s a huge undertaking. No one’s done any mapping of acequias in this region.”

Even after the acequias are mapped, she anticipates long delays in getting compensated or reimbursed for expenses related to acequia rehab. 

The acequias in San Miguel County support livestock and agriculture that contribute $30 million in economic output annually to the state, Garcia told a legislative panel last week. And it’s likely an undercount that reflects low census participation in the region. 

The average market value for farms in the region is about $20,000, she said. That may not sound like much. 

“But if you live here, and you’re making $20,000 a year off the land with your dignity, $20,000 is workable,” she told lawmakers. “I’ve seen my own family do that.”


‘Nobody seems to have much of an interest’


Acequias are falling through the cracks when it comes to the fire and flood recovery in northern New Mexico, said Bradshaw, the mayordomo of what’s known as the Encinal-Cañoncito Acequia. He can’t find anybody willing to help get the 200-year-old irrigation ditch he stewards flowing again.

“We can’t find anybody that will clean it out. There’s no entity from FEMA, fire teams, flood teams, the National Guard, Homeland Security,” he said. “Nobody seems to have much of an interest in the acequias.”

That said, he is meeting with FEMA on Thursday. He hopes the program will qualify for a fund geared for local governments, which is what an acequia district might be considered. But that program won’t provide up-front costs, only reimbursements.

Like many other acequia districts, Bradshaw said they don’t have the cash reserves to pay what he estimates is a $30,000 cleanup cost. So he doesn’t know where to find the cash, even if it’ll be reimbursed. Issuing $1,000 in assessment funds for the parciantes — individual irrigators — won’t help much, he said, and they can’t afford the cleanup tab, either. 

“We don’t know where that money will come from,” he said. “We can’t even afford a loan with low interest rates. What we’re looking for is a grant, which would be far better and get it done.”

Waiting until Thursday is a worrying prospect, Bradshaw said. 

They’ve had four floods in the valley since June 29, he said. The two most recent happened back-to-back, he said. Every day they wait to clear the acequia, the risk grows for further damage. 

“We have a meeting Thursday, but what’s that?” he said Friday. “We’ve already had two successive days of floods.”

Federal and state agencies took over a small fire department building in Buena Vista on July 14 to connect farmers and ranchers with the many programs that can help them. More than 100 attended, seeking information on the aid available, ranging from hay for their cattle and fence repair to mental health services. 

The programs come from an array of federal agencies like the United States Department of Agriculture, FEMA and the Environmental Protection Agency. They each have their own hurdles and pitfalls. 

Paula Garcia, executive director of the New Mexico Acequia Association, gave a presentation to a legislative committee last week, noting that many of the programs available require up-front payments to be reimbursed or they burden local governments with a share of the cost.  

She asked the state to consider stepping in to pay for the costs of acequia and watershed repair with the idea that FEMA will eventually reimburse the N.M. government. And she asked the congressional delegation to urge federal agencies to waive these costs, as they did for some of the fire suppression and compensation costs. 

Like Bradshaw’s, small acequia associations or county governments simply do not have cash reserves to spend, she said, even if they do get paid back eventually. In the meantime, every day spent working to come up with the funds is another day a farmer or rancher is displaced. 

FEMA previously reimbursed acequia-related expenses after wildfires, which is why Garcia’s hopeful the agency will come through again. 

But FEMA has also been criticized by victims of the fire and elected officials, who say the agency is too quick to deny aid applications.

Other programs could help farmers and ranchers, like individual forest restoration or conservation grants from the Farm Service Agency, which can also provide reimbursement for hay costs for farmers whose supply burnt up in the fires. 

Plus, the Environmental Protection Agency runs a program that successfully cleaned out debris from 164 properties as of July 11. But that program isn’t for acequias and is geared instead toward removing burned structures and other man-made debris.

Nearly 700 people applied for aid from the Emergency Watershed Program, Garcia said, but that program exists only to prevent damage, not to rehab. And the deadline was July 1. 

“Those are very fragmented individual grants to individual landowners,” Garcia told lawmakers. “We need major programs that are going to do landscape scale restoration.”


This story was first published at

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Thank you for taking part in our commenting section. We want this platform to be a safe and inclusive community where you can freely share ideas and opinions. Comments that are racist, hateful, sexist or attack others won’t be allowed. Just keep it clean. Do these things or you could be banned:

• Don’t name-call and attack other commenters. If you’d be in hot water for saying it in public, then don’t say it here.

• Don’t spam us.

• Don’t attack our journalists.

Let’s make this a platform that is educational, enjoyable and insightful.

Email questions to

Share your opinion


Join the conversation

Recommended for you