Today's Opinions

  • Ground the flight plan

    Last week’s Las Vegas community forum sponsored by the U.S. Air Force drove a few points home — and hopefully our nation’s military leaders took notice. More than that, they should realize the consequences to ignoring such an outcry.

  • Editorial Cartoon - Oct. 24, 2011
  • Publisher's Note: Collective memories

    Last month’s 10th anniversary of 9/11 got me to thinking about the national experiences that get etched into our collective memory. The ones in which we personally remember where we were and what we were doing when we first heard the news.

  • More money being misspent

    If you go and look at the work at the (West Las Vegas football) field, it does not follow the design the school paid for from the previous architect. Why? Here is another waste of taxpayers’ money, because the employee in charge of construction inspecting/oversight is nowhere to be found. Only the employees of the contractor are seen on site.

    My understanding of this project is that the school recently got the specifications for the work being performed for the board meeting. Now add $20,000 for not preparing the Request For Proposals correctly. ...

  • Thumbs - Our high country lowdown on the news

    THUMBS UP! THE PEOPLE SPOKE ... The U.S. Air Force plan to conduct low-attitude training flights over an area that includes San Miguel and Mora counties drew a full crowd Tuesday to Kennedy Hall on the Highlands University campus. About 150 people attended the public forum, dozens spoke against it and no one spoke in favor of the plan.

  • Nuestra Historia - La Gavilla de Silva

    Vicente Silva came to  Las Vegas in 1875 from Bernalillo, in Sandoval County. He soon opened, on the south plaza, a saloon and gambling house known as the Imperial Saloon. Silva’s wife Telésfora and her brother Gabriel Sandoval helped run the raucous saloon, which was open round-the-clock.

  • Editorial Cartoon - Oct. 21, 2011
  • An analysis of recent letters

    I want to thank Kim Reed-Deemer (letters published Sept. 26 and Oct. 14) and Bob Pearson (Oct. 14 letter) for their well-informed responses to letters by Annette Franklin and Janet Schwandt. I also appreciate Ms. Franklin (letters Sept. 19 and Oct. 10) and Ms. Schwandt (Oct. 3 letter) for expressing their views and encouraging a broader discussion of important issues.